A Group of Four People, Three Countries

This two month training course concludes with an plan that has taken up the majority of the last month. Our course of twelve trainees was split into three groups of four and I was in a group with Priya (from Tamil Nadu, India), Suri (Orissa, India) and Sakala (Kathmandu, Nepal). The action plan is meant to be a ‘plan of action’ for empowering your local community to identify and tackle a health-related problem. The methods of community identification, equity, integration of multiple sectors, and empowerment taught during the first month are now implemented into our local community. The month it took to write this action plan was an exciting and difficult experience.

Our group decided to focus on a community that Sakala was working with in southern Nepal. Sakala works with the Leprosy Mission (www.leprosymission.org/) and for the past couple of years has been involved in an unsuccessful community outreach project that had good intentions but failed because of its top-down approach and poor community-based methods. So Sakala came to Jamkhed to learn how to empower the community not to get rid of Leprosy but rather to physically and (more importantly) socially rehabilitate people with disability into the community. The disabled in these caste-driven societies of Nepal and India are so shunned from the community and their family that they are often kicked out of their home and forced to beg on the streets. We understood that there was a lot of social rehab that needed to be done before any physical rehab programs could be initiated.

The action plan became a great learning tool as we realized that in order to have the community invested in the project and create sustainability, an issue that they cared about and identified needed to be the starting point. The same was true when Drs. Mabelle and Raj Arole came to Jamkhed in the early 1970’s. Their mission was to treat and prevent disease but they were forced to start with projects that the community was interested in working with first, like agriculture and employment (food for work program). In Nepal, the community would not be interested in working to rehabilitate the disabled. After some hypothetical community activities (based on historical reality), the village decided that malnutrition was the top health priority. So while we went into the action plan hoping to tackle disability, the rest of it was dedicated to malnutrition. It was a brilliant lesson of equity and started at the level of the community and with their own needs identification. Disability would eventually be dealt with at a later point, but this project would have been as unsuccessful as the first without proper community participation.

The most trying task of putting together the action plan was working as a team and having productive disagreements rather than ranting arguments. Since we come from three different countries and very different backgrounds, we disagreed on a lot. The main issue was how to properly introduce ourself to the community and ensure that the most marginalized were included in our project. With varying levels of English proficiency, computer literacy, community experience and work ethic, we ended up spending most of the time working through arguments to the most agreed-upon solution. Discussing different methods and tactics was a great learning tool but getting frustrated and having them angry with you was not as nice. All-in-all the action plan was a success and if you’d like to see a copy of the 20-page report, let me know and I’ll email it to you.

The two-month training course ended on Saturday and provided me with the grounding to spend the next nine months on community projects and grant writing/fundraising. A major take-away lesson of the past two months is that success in health is achievable by trusting the community, empowering the socially-minded and using appropriate technology.